Chinese Art after 1279
First things first …
Many of us drop into a lecture on China after spending quite a bit of time looking at art and architecture in the west. The survey texts tend to place China after a quick foray into India. This can appear disjointed to students. To tie this content to things you may have already covered, in this lecture it can be helpful to create links between the struggles and innovations Chinese artists faced with those from Italy and other parts of Europe. Who could be an artist? What was the status of an artist? How does patronage work? In this lecture you can ask the students to think about how systems of belief (Confucianism, Daosim, Buddhism) are manifested in art and architecture in China particularly through landscape painting, but also in the creation of traditional “Chinese” porcelain. For example you could discuss scholarly literati painting, a tradition that counters the professional practice of court painting.
Comparing earlier Chinese art to that of the present can also be helpful. For example comparing the concerns of the literati painters with those of contemporary artist Ai Weiwei. Neil MacGregor’s discussion of intercultural exchange with regards to the “David” Vases ties in well to the issues of East-meets-West and tradition-meets-today in the work of Ai Weiwei, in particular his Sunflowers from 2010.
By stressing two themes in this lecture, transmission and politics, the link between diverse art periods and large geographic and chronological shifts can be established. The theme can also be used to address preconceptions of what “Chinese” art is.
Images and Readings …
Background reading might include the following texts if your library has them: Craig Clunas, Art in China (Oxford History of Art), 2009; Michael Sullivan, The Arts of China, 2009; Mary Tregear, Chinese Art, 1997.
The Metropolitan Museum’s Timeline of Art History site is useful, and is the Asia Society‘s info from the exhibition “The Artful Recluse,” in particular the Demonstration video on transmission and Don Qichang.
The documentary on contemporary Chinese artist Ai Weiwei Never Sorry (available for $5.00 on Netflix or Amazon) could be assigned ahead of the lecture or watched in class together stopping for discussion.
Content Suggestions ….
Teaching the second half of the survey is challenging. It’s hard to cover all of the material from roughly 1200 CE to the present. We often leave the contemporary materials to the end of the semester or quarter since this is traditionally how the art history texts have presented the material – in a fixed chronological order. But by this time, many of the students have forgotten some of the issues discussed in earlier lectures (and who can blame them!). By incorporating at least one contemporary artist into the lecture on China, the students can more easily get a sense of the continuity of the issues that face each generation. This practice can, of course, be applied to other art historical and geographical periods as well. Contemporary artist Ai Weiwei is included in the outline here. Further examples – Zhang Huan and Huang Yan – are contemporary Chinese artists who can be incorporated into the lecture when discussing issues of Confucianism (control, familial authority and social order) or calligraphy and traditional landscape painting.
In an hour and fifteen minutes, this content area can be investigated through many objects, including:
- Zhao Mengfu, Groom and Horse, 1296, Yuan dynasty (1271–1368)
- Zhao Mengfu, Twin Pines, Level Distance, c. 1300, Yuan dynasty (1271–1368)
- Zhao Mengfu, Autumn Colors on the Qiao and Hua Mountains, 1296. Yuan Dynasty, Late Yuan Literati Painting
- Fan Kuan, Travelers Among Mountains and Streams, 11th century, Northern Song Dynasty
- Ni Zhan, The Rongxi Studio, 1372, Yuan Dynasty
- Dong Qichang, The Qingbian Mountains in the Manner of Tung Yuan, 1617
- Yin Hong, Hundreds of Birds Admiring the Peacocks, late 15th/early 16th century, Ming Dynasty
- Shen Zhou, Poet on a Mountaintop, c. 1500, Ming Dynasty
- Shitao, Landscape, c. 1700
- “David” Vases, c. 1351
- Ai Weiwei, Sunflower Seed/Turbine Hall, Tate Modern, 2010
Historical outline: see lecture notes
Creating reading prompts or using Dr. Guintini’s video above can help facilitate a more informed and livelier discussion of of Never Sorry, the Ai Weiwei documentary. Showing the Ai Weiwei version of PSY’s Gangnam Style, discussing the subsequent censorship by the Chinese government, and viewing the support videos by Anish Kapoor and the many museums who also responded can be a fun way to re-introduce art and political action into class. Another great resource is Ai’s Twitter account, which is part of his “aristic toolbox” and a platform for him to call people to action and draw attewntion to his own.
Connect Ai’s practice to earlier discussion of the literati artists who were also participating in politically-minded art making.
Family Tree, 2000
Huang Yan’s work makes reference to a Chinese cultural heritage that is innate to every Chinese artist, and one could argue, every Chinese person.
Information can be found here. The porcelain bust can also be addressed within the context of the “David” Vases and Ai’s Sunflower Seeds.
Chinese Landscapes, begun in 1999.
The Cultural Revolution and the Iconic Image of Chairman Mao
A large number of artists also make art that directly addresses that iconic image of Chairman Mao and the effects of the Cultural Revolution and its current evolution. For information on propaganda posters used during the Cultural Revolution see this site.
Zhang Hongtu’ Chariman Mao, #3 (1989)
Li Shan’s Rouge series (1989-1993)
Sui Jianguo’s Legacy Model (c. 1997)
The three artists above are among several contemporary Chinese artists who index Chairman Mao in their work. Information on these artists (as well as on Zhang and Huang) can be found in the following:
Melissa Chiu, Asian Art Now (2010); Melissa Chiu and Benjamin Genocchio, Contemporary Art in Asia: A Critical Reader (2011); Jiehong Jiang, Burden Or Legacy: From the Chinese Cultural Revolution to Contemporary Art (2007); and Richard Vine, New China Art (2011).
Andy Warhol’s Chairman Mao (c. 1973) is also an excellent example to either insert into this lecture or for use in the Pop lecture as a reference to past material for the students – making connections between what appear to be disparate cultures.
The print can be discussed in several ways:
- as commodity (in reference to the discussion of the “David” Vases) in terms of Warhol’s own production practices
- in terms of auctions and the contemporary art market
- a discussion of Warhol can also fit well into issues of criticisms of the contemporary Chinese government as also raised in the work of Ai Weiwei. For example, in 2013 a new museum of contemporary art in Shanghai, The Power Station of Art, opened an exhibition of Warhol’s work but declined to hang any of his Chairman Mao prints.
- as an example of mass production, which is also as issue for Ai Weiwei.
- censorship and the Chinese government
- as a symbol of remembrance, which can link the subject to almost any other art historical period of the semester
At the end of the class ….
A close analysis exercise: Assign either the chapter or video on the “David” Vases from MacGregor’s A History of the World in 100 Objects. Dependent upon which is chosen, the instructor can write prompts for the students while they assess this material, which can facilitate a livelier discussion in class. (Requiring that they hand in the answers to these prompts creates a more likely scenario that students will actually consult the assigned material). Smarthistory provides a how-to video by Dr. Parme Guintini on How to Watch and Listen Critically.